Legislature(2009 - 2010)
2009-04-17 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2009-04-17 House Journal Page 1065 SB 96 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 96(FIN) "An Act relating to nonpayment of child support, to the definition of the term "state" for the purposes of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, to certain judicial and administrative orders for medical support of a child, to periodic review and adjustment of child support orders, to relief from administrative child support orders, to child support arrearages, and to medical support of a child and the Alaska Native family assistance program; amending Rule 90.3, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT HCS(JUD) 2DP 3NR 2AM 954 FN1: ZERO(REV) 955 FIN RPT HCS(FIN) 7DP 1055 FN1: ZERO(REV) 1055 Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 96(FIN) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 96(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third 2009-04-17 House Journal Page 1066 reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 96(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 96(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 96(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Tuck, Wilson And so, HCS CSSB 96(FIN) passed the House. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 96(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.